![]() ![]() On the surface, Microsoft looks like a natural monopoly of the computer industry. It's cheaper for the consumer - and more efficient for the state - to have one tightly regulated private company running the show. You'd have to build power plants and string miles of cable to create a workable infrastructure. That's because there's a huge barrier of entry for starting a competing electric company. In most cities and towns, you have no choice about which electric company to use. ![]() Utility companies are classic examples of natural monopolies. As an example, the writer cites an announcement from Oracle that called its latest creation "bulletproof." It was successfully attacked the next day. To make matters worse, he says, boasting about security features is bound to attract hackers hungry for a challenge. The real question, according to veteran tech writer Rob Enderle, is whether anyone at any company could successfully repel the near-constant barrage of attacks that plague Microsoft products. ![]() They've also built Windows Vista to be substantially more secure than XP. In recent years, they've launched several long-term, far-reaching security initiatives, including Trustworthy Computing, End to End Trust and most recently, Microsoft Security Essentials. Microsoft employs some of the sharpest minds in the field of cyber security, including security chief Michael Howard and Linux security expert Crispin Cowan. Despite the rabid criticism of the security weaknesses of Windows XP, it's wrong to say that Microsoft doesn't care about security. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |